The International Reading Association
Home |  Contact Us | Help | Site Map

Abstract of

The Effects of Theoretically Different Instruction and Student Characteristics on the Skills of Struggling Readers

 

full text - HTML   full text - PDF

 

This study investigated the effectiveness of combining enhanced classroom instruction and intense supplemental intervention for struggling readers in first grade. Further, it compared two supplemental interventions derived from distinct theoretical orientations, examining them in terms of effects on academic outcomes and whether children's characteristics were differentially related to an instructional intervention. One intervention (Proactive Reading) was aligned with behavioral theory and was derived from the model of Direct Instruction. The other intervention (Responsive Reading) was aligned with a cognitive theory and was derived from a cognitive-apprenticeship model. These interventions were provided to small groups of first-grade students at risk for reading difficulties. Students were assessed on various reading and reading-related measures associated with success in beginning reading. Results indicated that (a) first-grade students who were at risk for reading failure and who received supplemental instruction in the Responsive or Proactive interventions scored higher on measures of reading and reading-related skills than students who received only enhanced classroom instruction, (b) enhanced classroom instruction appeared to promote high levels of reading growth for many children at risk for reading failure, (c) the two interventions were essentially equally effective even though they reflected different theoretical perspectives, and (d) children's characteristics did not differentially predict the effectiveness of an intervention.

Abstract from Mathes, P.G., Denton, C.A., Fletcher, J.M., Anthony, J.L., Francis, D.J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005, April/May/June). The Effects of Theoretically Different Instruction and Student Characteristics on the Skills of Struggling Readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 148–182. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.2

 

arrowMore About RRQ

arrowArchives

arrowSelected Articles

arrowSubscription/Access Information

design image design image

arrowArticles that
cite this article



arrowEnglish

arrowFrançais

arrowDeutsch

arrowEspañol


menu arrowJournals

The Reading Teacher

Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy

Reading Research Quarterly

Lectura y Vida

Reading Online

menu arrowBooks, Brochures, Videos

menu arrowReading Today

menu arrowRights and Permissions

menu arrowFor Authors

menu arrowFor Reviewers

menu arrowFor Advertisers