Articles that cite this article:

The National Reading Panel Report

James W. Cunningham

Articles that cite this article (and are available online) include:

Belzer, A., & Clair, R.t. (2005). Back to the Future: Implications of the Neopositivist Research Agenda for Adult Basic Education. Teachers College Record, 107, 1393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00517.x

Burns, M.K. (2003). Reexamining data from the national reading panel's meta-analysis: Implications for school psychology. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 605. doi:10.1002/pits.10110

L. Allington, R. (2006). Reading Lessons and Federal Policy Making: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue. The Elementary School Journal, 107, 3. doi:10.1086/509523

Lefstein, A. (2005). Thinking about the technical and the personal in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 333. doi:10.1080/03057640500319040

Mesmer, H.E., & Griffith, P.L. (2005). Everybody's Selling It—But Just What Is Explicit, Systematic Phonics Instruction?. The Reading Teacher, 59, 366. doi:10.1598/RT.59.4.6

Shaker, P., & Heilman, E.E. (2004). The New Common Sense of Education: Advocacy Research Versus Academic Authority. Teachers College Record, 106, 1444. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00385.x

White, T.G. (2005). Effects of Systematic and Strategic Analogy-Based Phonics on Grade 2 Students' Word Reading and Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 234. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.2.5