|
Articles that cite this article: A Comparative Analysis of Student and Teacher Development in More and Less Proficient Discussions of LiteratureJanice F. AlmasiJohn F. O'FlahavanPoonam AryaArticles that cite this article (and are available online) include:Berne, J.I., & Clark, K.F. (2006). Comprehension Strategy Use During Peer-Led Discussions of Text: Ninth Graders Tackle “The Lottery”. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49, 674. doi:10.1598/JAAL.49.8.4 Berry, R.W. (2006). Teacher Talk During Whole-Class Lessons: Engagement Strategies to Support the Verbal Participation of Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 21, 211. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2006.00219.x Lloyd, S. (2004). Using Comprehension Strategies as a Springboard for Student Talk. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48, 114. doi:10.1598/JAAL.48.2.3 Nussbaum, E. (2002). Appropriate Appropriation: Functionality of Student Arguments and Support Requests During Small-Group Classroom Discussions. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 501. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3404_5 Townsend, J.S., & Pace, B.G. (2005). The Many Faces of Gertrude: Opening and Closing Possibilities in Classroom Talk. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48, 594. doi:10.1598/JAAL.48.7.5 |
|
|||||